Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Compare Safety and Efficacy of a Metallic Cannula with that of a Standard Needle for Soft Tissue Augmentation of the Nasolabial Folds


Background

Injection-related side effects and complications are likely to occur during or after filler injections; they are mainly caused by the injection technique.



Objective

To assess safety and efficacy of a metallic cannula to inject hyaluronic acid (HA) filler in the nasolabial folds and to compare the safety of this cannula with that of a standard needle.



Methods

This was a prospective, randomized, phase II, double-blinded study that included 25 participants with Grade 2 to 3 for bilateral nasolabial folds according to the Modified Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Scale (MFWS). The side of the injection was randomized ...

Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Compare Safety and Efficacy of a Metallic Cannula with that of a Standard Needle for Soft Tissue Augmentation of the Nasolabial Folds is a post from: Skincare




Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Compare Safety and Efficacy of a Metallic Cannula with that of a Standard Needle for Soft Tissue Augmentation of the Nasolabial Folds via BuzzBlazer.com

No comments:

Post a Comment